When writing a full practical report this section is one of the most important. Other scientists can see how good your results were and how you think they could be improved.
To analyse your results
you usually need to display your results in the form of a graph and discus what
you think the pattern they form means.
*Click
here** for more information on how to plot graphs and how to choose
what type of graph you need to use.*
**Using Scatter Graphs to get an idea of the range of readings**
Rather that just
plotting the average results you can plot a scatter graph.
Put each
set of results (and the average set) **on the same graph in a different
colour**. Put a key onto the graph too.
The advantage of
a scatter graph is that it allows you to analyse the **precision** of the
results you have obtained. You can see at a glance how widely spaced
the points are - how big a range of readings your have obtained. This allows you to comment on your procedure and discuss
why you got such (im)precise readings. You can comment
on how clearly the points indicate a straight line or curve... and where,
if anywhere, there are anomolies or more readings would be useful. Any calculations
you need to do should be done in this section. The general trend
of your results could be a straight line. Therefore you need to comment
on the two physical properties you have plotted being proportional to
each other. If the line goes through the origin they are *directly*
proportional. Use 'mathematical
speak' if you can - compare your line to Y=mx + c, use words like gradient
and intercept, positive/negative correlation etc. ... and finally
relate you results to the theoretical knowledge you referred to in the
introduction. Say something like: 'the straight line was as presicted
from theory, as **** gets stronger the ***** increases because the particles....
or whatever!' |